Sabtu, 27 September 2008

FACE TIME


Face Time
What is church? - This is another topic that came up at the Kingdom Economic Summit last week. Marketplace ministries often find themselves in a tension between going to church and becoming the church. Let's define "church."
The congregation - In the West the concept of church is usually several meetings a week in a building led by the pastor or his delegate. We "go to church" and we ask others "do you go to church" or "what church do you attend." It's a good concept. We're not throwing rocks at it. The preaching format is Biblical, the worship is filled with the presence of God, and new believers receive a spiritual foundation for their lives. Children's ministries are often excellent.
The home group - Home groups, cell groups, or house church is a group of under 10 - 15 that meets weekly. There is a biblical lesson and a leader to teach it but the smaller format is more conducive to discussion and questions; same dynamic as Jesus and the 12.
The two basic approaches above assume you need the contents of the lesson involved in the meeting. Not a bad assumption - it's just not as relevant as finding out what you really need and addressing it. Congregations and home groups are really different variations on pew time where we can learn something from the lesson or sermon.
Face Time - Here's reality. There is a large group in the marketplace that either; 1) don't have time for a life-long series of lessons, 2) don't have the patience, or 3) already have several decades of lessons under their belts and don't feel the same level of need. Are we saying they don't need "church?" Nope. We're just suggesting that for some, the most relevant format for spiritual growth comes from peer mentoring relationships we'll call "face time."
Once we are mature enough to say yes to personal ministry in the marketplace the most helpful mentoring comes from peers that are already functioning in that particular area. If you could find a small group of peers seasoned with experience in your field and committed to help make you a success, would you be interested? Businessmen often hire that service from consultants at a high price. What if we viewed it as ministry and gave it to one another? What if it included counsel on practical things like cash flow and prophetic ministry at the same time? What if profits and prophets came in the same package?
Freely you have received , freely give.  Matt 10:8 NIV
18 "I tell you the truth, whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven.

19 "Again, I tell you that if two of you on earth agree about anything you ask for, it will be done for you by my Father in heaven. 20 For where two or three come together in my name, there am I with them." Matt 18:18-20
What do you need to take the next step? - For example, a businessman is generally interested in getting help taking his business to the next level by improving his product and profits, blessing his employees, connecting with his Kingdom purpose, and managing time for his wife and family. Those "general" needs do come up occasionally in the lesson version of church. Sometimes we can be more specific with our businessman through the prophetic ministry. However, we're best when we have the face time and simply ask what he or she needs to take the next step in their business / ministry. At some level, groups like this are closer to "church" than either congregations or home groups (although we don't need to play one against the other).
Key ingredients for "Face Time" - I'll update this list over time and welcome your comments if you've participated in something similar.
1. It's a small group of peers and friends with the a similar resume that minister to one another on a weekly or monthly basis. Kent Humphries helped me with this concept. He's a businessman that primarily travels and ministers on Marketplace Ministry (gone on Sundays). He takes a plane to Denver once a month to meet with his group of peers. At each get together one member of the group is the primary focus of ministry. The other members are chosen for their experience to help with new ideas and new networks of contacts. The heart of each participant is a willingness to give and receive on a personal and professional level.
not forsaking our own assembling together, as is the habit of some, but encouraging one another... Heb 10:25 NASU
2. Each participant loves the other guys enough to help them become successful over the long haul. "Accountability" isn't quite the right term unless you think of it in terms of helping a brother or sister inherit all of their land. We're helping one another through the spiritual warfare involved in becoming David's "mighty men" to do great exploits. We're not competing against one other; we're competing with a small group of friends to inspire one another to greater heights. We're on the same team.
Though one may be overpowered, two can defend themselves. A cord of three strands is not quickly broken. Eccl 4:12 NIV
 
Check it out - Here are some examples Kent gave me - existing organizations experienced with "Face Time." You can do the same thing without the entry fee but sometimes the experience is worth the price to speed up the process. I found the video testimonies especially interesting.
Kent Humphreys - FCCI see their summary
Rick Miller - CBMC see excellent videos; note wives' perspective
Marc Ottestad - BBL Forum see their Video
Buck Jacobs - C12 Group see their video
 
Love,
 
John & Sue   

Rabu, 24 September 2008

CHANGING CHURCH - CHANGING EARTH


Changing Church - Changing Earth
by Greg Austin www.gregaustin.org

(The following was written ten years ago, in 1998. Reading it again today caused me to edit a few lines, but the text is largely the same as when I first wrote, and is more applicable today than it was a decade ago. GJA)
 
In this critical hour in earth's history, the Holy Spirit of God is leading those "who have an ear" into a new dimension of revelation and glory. Any return to the status quo, business-as-usual, traditional church experience will only frustrate the full desire of the Spirit of God.
 
I'm convinced that God is raising up a NEW VOICE, a NEW FACE and a NEW HEART in the earth. On a recent flight I read an article that reported that in Great Britain less than 2% of the population claims to attend church at all. Something is gravely wrong when the land that felt the footsteps of Spurgeon, Whitefield, Wesley, Wigglesworth and so many others has deteriorated into the state it currently languishes in.
 
In America, the times of Jonathon Edwards have become merely historic; indeed few Christians today can even recall the story of a Great Awakening that once shook the very foundations of the nation. The echo of Azusa Street has faded into oblivion even as Street by that name was turned into a narrow alleyway. Aimee Semple McPherson, John G. Lake, Oral Roberts, Billy Graham all shook the land, but their efforts are now represented by so little.
 
Those who are seeking to plumb the depths of God's Spirit and His well of wisdom must look beyond former personalities and movements for direction and understanding. What God is doing is BEYOND. God told Daniel to "seal up the prophecy" because it would require a future generation to understand. There is a new generation that has risen with understanding, and those who will hear "what the Spirit says to the churches" must listen intently.
 
As I watched the faces of young leaders at a staff meeting in a world-renowned church recently my heart ached to just get up and shout to them,
 
"You can change your nation! Get up! Get full of God! Get His Power and His Resource and His Word and His Wisdom and His Enablement and storm the nations with His love and grace and mercy!!!!!!!!!!"
 
I love the men and women God raised up in former generations. God uniquely used them in their own times, but God is not mired in the past and He is not satisfied with what has been.
 
The previous generation of leaders knew and experienced God within the dimension of their own understanding. It was an understanding that we now recognize as part of an “Old Wineskin” of revelation, manifestation and tradition. And God continues to use these men and women and their understandings of Christian ministry in this hour. And so, as I write this, my mind presents to me a mental image of a bridge. Could it be that God desires – intends – to use this former generation to provide strength and stability for a new generation and a New Wineskin, while developing this entirely new generation and new concept of changing the earth through God’s glory?
 
I believe something significant is contained in the Darlene Zschech song, "Touching Heaven, Changing Earth." Greater concern on "touching heaven" will produce a changed earth. The focus has been on doing "things:" Developing programs and producing strategies has caused the church to focus on the "doing." Growing churches, gaining numbers and increasing budgets began to replace growing in Christ and gaining spiritual knowledge by the Spirit. Maintaining inherited ministries, and “doing” the work of the ministry provided a playground for our spiritual enemy as hell initiated the subtle shift in focus from “being” to “doing.” And while we were “doing” we lost sight of the “touching heaven” aspect of our faith. What we called “church” became an organization, a machine and an institution; it devolved into a corporation and ceased to be the corporate Body Jesus left in the care of eleven men two thousand years ago.
 
God is looking for those who will concentrate on "being." If our concerns should turn from the next ministry emphasis to an emphasis on heaven, on worshipping, loving, and hearing God, and on building deep, spiritual relationships with others in the Body of Christ, the resulting transformations in our own lives would have a powerful impact on the earth!
 
We've got to touch heaven! We've got to become more connected with heaven than we are connected with a denomination or church or a religious system that promises water and produces sand! Until our supreme connection is with heaven, all our best attempts to change our world will fall flat and we will find ourselves in jeopardy of spiritual mutiny.
 
This is where the heart of ministry will derive in the coming days – from men and women who have sought the face of God and who have found relationship with one another until the very essence of Jesus may be seen by the world.
 
This emergent church cannot be as churches have been, or we will no longer have a reason to exist. My heart cries to a young, eager and zealous generation: Let God lead you into the deep; into uncharted waters, and into latitudes no one ever has explored.
 
Make no mistake: This is FLESH and BLOOD and not ORGANIZATION and BUILDINGS and GROWTH CHARTS and sanctimonious SCORE CARDS.
 
God is building something far more substantive than an organization or a building. He's building His church. That church has little or nothing to do with buildings, budgets and Big Name personalities. Observing the machinery of yesterday’s church may be instructional, but what we need in this hour is relational. Please, turn your heart and your ear from the former things and the former ways – Refuse to imitate yesterday's anointing and discover fresh oil for today.
 
Do not remember the former things, Nor consider the things of old. Behold, I will do a new thing, Now it shall spring forth; Shall you not know it? I will even make a road in the wilderness And rivers in the desert. The beast of the field will honor Me, The jackals and the ostriches, Because I give waters in the wilderness And rivers in the desert, To give drink to My people, My chosen. This people I have formed for Myself; They shall declare My praise. (Isaiah 43:18-21)

FROM SEATING CAPACITY TO STANDING CAPACITY


From Seating Capacity to Sending Capacity:
Why an Incarnational Kingdom on Mission is Very Attractive
by Neil Cole
If we think that a model of church is our solution to reaching the world we are already in a bad place, whether that model is a mega church or a micro church.
There is a vast difference, however, between an attractional posture and an incarnational/missional understanding of church. The difference is not in the organization, but in the release and flow of God's kingdom. The church is not meant to be sedentary but sent-"one holy, apostolic (sent) church."
Today we expect the lost to come to us. In the Bible, God is always the Seeker going after those who are lost. He pursued Adam in a garden and Moses in a desert. He found Jonah at the bottom of the sea and Peter on top. Jesus found Matthew in an office and Paul out on the road.

God became a man and entered the world through a birth canal just like the rest of us. He chose to come to us on our turf, rather then expecting us to rise to His. Jesus preached everywhere that the kingdom of God has come near. He came to seek and to save the lost, and He now invites us to join Him.

Many ask: "How can we make the church more attractive to the lost?" If we start down this path we unintentionally leave our true path: Letting people see how attractive Jesus is! It's all about Jesus ...not us. In a sense, for every step we take toward impressing people with our own strengths we move further from letting them become impressed with His.

God always prefers to reveal Himself in weak things rather strong. It is the simple vessels that often reveal God's glory more then having to find Him in the midst of laser lights and fog machines. The curiosity of a child's question; the embrace of a loving grandmother; the accepting handshake of a good friend; the smile of a proud father; the warmth of a soft shoulder to cry on-these are the things that reveal God's character more than any sermon.

Love for one another is a powerful ingredient in evangelism, but sitting in an auditorium listening to a preacher talk about it is not as powerful as being able to see it and taste it first hand. A "neighbor nudge" for two minutes on Sunday morning is not enough.
Coming into a home with a loving spiritual family-each praying, singing and sharing their inner lives-is amazing for someone who never learned to trust. Sensing the power of Christ working in and through those people can break even the most hardened heart.
More than once, I have seen toughened gangsters and drug dealers, weep in the presence of Christ among His people and pour out confession unsolicited. I have seen a Palestinian Muslim surrender everything to Christ in the midst of a faith community praying together. Four fraternity brothers gave their life to Christ in a meeting at their frat house in front of their peers unreservedly. Christ in us is powerful; it is the hope of glory. Simply being another anonymous person in a pew is not so powerful.

The reality is most people are not even curious about what is happening in church. For the few who are seeking, the last place they want to look is in church. Why? Because church is seen as a passive religious event that demands allegiance but offers very little experience. We ask for volunteers all the time. We offer spiritual-gift assessments to see where people fit best in our program, but we never really offer very challenging experiences for people. Handing out bulletins, directing traffic wearing a bright orange vest, chaperoning a youth function, or changing a diaper in the nursery may be helpful for the church program, but none of it is a task worth giving your life to. Many who struggle to do these things have a nagging unspoken question: "Did Jesus come so I can do this?"

We must transition from seeing church as a once-a-week worship event to an ongoing spiritual family on mission together. Then people will see church as something worth giving your life for. Honestly, people need one another more then they need another inspiring message. You would be surprised what people will do for Jesus , or for a brother or sister, that they will not do for a vision statement and a capital giving campaign.

One side effect of pursuing excellence in production is that common Christians become spectators who can contribute a percentage of their income to keep things going, but little more. We have raised the bar on how church is done so high that few believe they could ever do it themselves. The dark side of this endeavor is that we have lowered the bar of what it means to be a Christian so that simply showing up to the weekly one hour event with some regularity and a check book is all it takes.

My goal in life is to reverse this. I want to lower the bar of how church is done so that anyone can do it, and raise the bar of what it means to be a disciple so that they will do it.

I will never forget meeting with an organic church made up of high school students. As we were all singing praises to the Lord I felt His pleasure. I asked the students to share the biggest church they had ever been to. Southern California has many mega-churches. Several were mentioned, ranging from 2,000 to 20,000 attendees.

"I think Satan is more intimidated by this little church of 15 kids than by any of those Godzilla-sized churches," I said. They all snickered and looked around the room at one another with smiles, thinking that the old man had finally lost his mind.

I then showed them why I thought this way. I asked, "How many of you think you could start a church like one of those mega-churches?" No one raised a hand. I then asked, "How many of you think you could start a church like this one?" All raised their hands. The snickering stopped. It was one of those holy moments in life that are hard to forget. I then asked them to look around the room at all the raised hands, and I said, "I assure you, Satan is terrified by this. And he should be!"
 

Rabu, 17 September 2008

ROLE OF A HOUSE CHURCH LEADER



Role of a House Church Leader
Rad Zdero, Ph.D.

As house church or small group leaders, our job is not simply to organize a weekly meeting, but rather to build community between members, facilitate spiritual growth, and create an inviting atmosphere for newcomers. Our job is not unlike that of the apostle Paul, who wrote, “we delighted to share with you not only the gospel of God but our lives as well, because you had become so dear to us” (1 Thes 2:8). The house church elder has two roles, namely that of Shepherd and Strategist.

***Principle. What is common sense must become common practice***




Shepherd (nurture, protect, “heart”)

Set tone, boundaries, safety
set out protection for people in the group
e.g. at the start of each new group or when new people joint, I usually state that (1) anyone can say anything but with respect, (2) group confidentiality

Stimulate Relationships
bad leader – creates a group whose primary relationship is with him/her
good leader – stimulates relationships b/w members
e.g. test – from time to time I’ll leave the room during group to see if conversation continues

Resolve Conflicts
do not need to be ‘police’ but will need to be arbitrator from time to time…encourage people to resolve it themselves first
e.g. I have had to ask someone to leave a group b/c they were way too disruptive continually

Pray for People
nurture an environment of prayer as far as the group depends by praying one-on-one, during group time, and encouraging others to pray
e.g. seekers group – I had quiet time at end of group as opportunity to pray…some started to…
e.g. shy people - I ask people before hand to if they’re willing to open/close in prayer or even the day or week before

Be Aware of Special Needs
be aware of people and their individual needs and wants
e.g. intellectual needs – learning tracks – resource individuals with books, seminars, videos, etc
e.g. physical – if the person is a shut in or in a wheel chair you can still involve them greatly (I had a friend host our group in his home because he was in a wheel chair and was shut in during cold months)
e.g. emotional – does someone need professional counseling that you can’t give?




Strategist (vision, direction, “head”)
Conduct, Lead, and Organize the House Church or Cell group
can share facilitation, it is important that the HC leader actually lead…primary leader needs to be there, otherwise nothing will get done or way too slowly…don’t be afraid to lead and make decisions
BUT, look for opportunities to involve people - we remember 10 % of what we read, 20 % of what we hear, 30 % of what we see, 50 % of what we hear and see, 70 % of what we say ourselves, 90 % of what we do ourselves (Wolfgang Simson, Houses that Change the World, p.86)

Mentoring or Peer Mentoring with House Church co-leader
right from get go, start ‘training’ your junior co-leader…look for delegation opportunities…
get together regularly to talk about, plan, and pray for the group, pray for each other…
e.g. alternate leading the discussions from week to week (or part of the evening) or calling or organizing

One-on-One Mentoring of Others in the Group
need mentors: non, new, or growing Christians, people in pain, emerging leaders
this doesn’t have to be only you, can be your co-leader or someone else in the group
e.g. I had 2 mentors/spiritual dads who met weekly with me for 2 years and 4 years, and I have mentored a number of folks too over extended periods of time, several months to years

Identify Emerging Leaders
right from your first get together, look for potential leaders
not necessarily the most vocal or gifted person, but rather F.A.T.
Faithful (keen and eager, they fulfill their promises, consistently do prep work if required)
Available (make time to be there and get involved in other ways…not the person who is last to arrive and first to leave)
Teachable (open, not big complainer, willing to try things, learner’s attitude)

“Open Chair” – new people, evangelism
be open and deliberate about inviting new people and encourage others in the group to do so
model it, pray about it, encourage/talk about it
e.g. some groups literally have an open chair during their time as a reminder, and spend some time together to pray for the new person who will one day fill it

Know when to Multiply your group, Plant a new group, or End your group
is your group willing to multiply or plant ? what are the obstacles ?
multiply or plant when…
group gets big (20 or so)
when there are 1 or 2 who want to plant a new group (at work or school or neighbourhood)…encourage them…commission them officially during the group time to start a new one…pray for them
in some cases it is best to end your group temporarily or permanently, if…
group gets stale/boring or is together way too long…usually if a group does not multiply/plant in 1-1.5 yrs, it probably never will

About the Author
Rad Zdero, Ph.D., earned his doctorate in Mechanical Engineering from Queen’s University in Kingston, Canada. He has been starting and leading small groups and house churches for 15 years and is currently part of a team starting up ‘House Church Canada’, which is intent on birthing a multiplying network of house churches in the greater Toronto area. He is also the author of The Global House Church Movement, available from William Carey Library, www.WCLbooks.com
Mail: House Church Canada, Box 42067, 128 Queen St.S, Mississauga, ON, Canada, L5M-4Z0.
Phone: 905-820-8846
Website: www.housechurch.ca, Email: rad@housechurch.ca

Selasa, 16 September 2008

SMALL GROUP EVANGELISM


Small Group Evangelism
Rad Zdero © March 2000, rad@housechurch.ca, www.housechurch.ca

Introduction
The Christian community today recognizes and utilizes the power of small groups, often referred to as Cells, as vehicles for spiritual nurture, accountability, intimacy, and growth in a particular area of knowledge. In many churches and faith communities there are a number of such subgroups to plug into – prayer groups, bible study groups, book study groups, affinity groups, accountability groups, home groups, and the list goes on. Often, however, these huddles are geared toward the development of the Christian (i.e. discipleship) as a very specific outcome.
The purpose of this short article is to open up some of the possibilities of utilizing small groups as a vehicle for very intentional, creative and sensitive evangelism. Let me state that I am not saying here that evangelism should only be done one way or that there is necessarily a best way – this is dictated by context usually. What is given in this article, however, is an examination of an alternate way of thinking about evangelism specifically in the context of small groups.
Two Approaches to Evangelism
Now let’s suppose that our spheres of influence as Christians – such as the city we live in, our immediate neighborhood, our workplace, our circle of friends, or maybe our school - is like a flowing river (see diagram). The river represents the various contexts that we have in which we relate, in the daily ebb and flow of life, with the lost. Our non-Christian friends are like fish in the river, some are big, some small, some are easier to get along with than others. Some are very open to engaging on faith issues, whereas others are either indifferent or hostile. So, we see this huge opportunity to ‘be Jesus’ and ‘see Jesus’ and to engage those around us with the good news. So, now what do we do? There are two choices as I see it, namely bridge fishing and small boat fishing.

Bridge Fishing
Belonging to a tight knit group that has a somewhat definable goal is, unfortunately, not only a foreign experience to many followers of Jesus, but also to much of larger society. And so, when it comes to evangelism, the Christian approach is often similar to someone who gets their fishing pole, worms it, and positions themselves at the most strategic spot they know of on the bridge. This tactic ensures that we never get wet or dirty or in any kind of real close contact with dirty and smelly fish, until we catch one and pull it up to where we are.
In actuality, this might mean that we invite a friend to an ‘outreach’ event that’s coming to town, or perhaps we invite someone to church or a church related event, or we take part in a missions week that our church or campus group is sponsoring by going door-to-door in our neighborhood handing out videos on Jesus, etc.
The advantages of this method are that it’s safer, cleaner, and less risky for the person doing the evangelizing. There’s not much of a chance that we’ll have to go to places and be with people that may challenge our moral or theological views. The main disadvantage, though, is that we’ll never truly be challenged and forced to grow in what we believe by thoughtful non-Christians. And we may never really get to know any non-kingdom friends up close and personally until they become Christians.
So, bridge fishing is more of a ‘suck in’ rather than a ‘reach out’, periodically going out on evangelism raids rather than becoming an insider in our non-Christian circles. I‘m not suggesting that this strategy has no place at all, because that is in fact how I became a Christian, by someone handing out Bibles. But, I think there is a complementary approach that may be ideally suited for today's Christians, namely small boat fishing.


Small Boat Fishing
Imagine a Small Boat that’s part of a larger fleet of similar boats whose main purpose is to catch fish (see diagram). The crew of each small boat eats together, hangs out, strategizes, encourages every member of the team, and casts out the fishing nets together. They are a unit. They do everything together: move, stop, slow down, speed up, change direction, pull up the nets, put down the nets. They make decisions quickly in a non-bureaucratic manner regarding issues like when they need to buy new nets, fix the side of the boat, and change directions. They also have the accountability, support and direction that comes from being part of a larger fleet of such boats.
This method may look something like a small group of five or six friends who have decided that they want to intentionally reach out to their friends together as a team. Their main thrust and contribution to evangelism is in the context of what this small team does. They meet together once a week, pray for each other and their non-Christian friends, learn from each other’s attempts at evangelism, brainstorm on overcoming obstacles, invite their seeker friends to social occasions or events, and get into each other’s social spheres. They are mobile, flexible, non-bureaucratic, quick to implement decisions and changes, and have support from each other as part of a team. There is also the accountability and intimacy that naturally evolves in being part of a close knit team.
The main caution here is that, unless this small boat is part of a larger network of small boats doing the same thing, an independent and Isolated Small Boat (see diagram) can potentially sink or get shipwrecked due to questionable doctrine, unhealthy practices, lack of direction and not much space. The other danger is that using an overly large group, i.e. Big and Loud Boat, as an evangelistic tool that meets, say, in someone’s home, may possibly scare some people away because it is large, loud and may seem cultish. We need to be aware of the potential obstacles with any approach we take, however, making sure to capitalize on the strengths of each as well.
Examples of Small Boat Fishing
From my personal experience, the advantages of small boat fishing far outweigh the potential dangers involved. As such, this section explores 6 possible scenarios, based on personal experience, of how this approach to evangelism could work within the context of one small fishing boat. One thing to keep in mind here is the importance of being an ‘insider’ and full participant in our non-Christian networks. Without such insider status, small boat fishing can easily degenerate into ‘suck in’ evangelism rather than ‘reach out’ evangelism.
Discussion Dinners
A discussion dinner is basically an event hosted periodically (maybe monthly) by the evangelistically oriented small group, in which members invite a few non-Christian friends to an evening meal. This is followed by people gathering in the living room for a short 10-20 minute presentation that addresses some important questions of life (e.g. does God exist?, why so much suffering?, who is Jesus?, etc) to launch the discussion. The material used to start the evening’s discussion is usually a contemporary and mainstream music video, movie, poem, song, newspaper article, painting, etc. The key here, as in any small group, is to make sure that all opinions are valued and allowed to be fully expressed and explored. A good discussion facilitator is required. The non-Christian friend should not feel pounced on or cornered or that their opinion is somehow wrong. Remember, the purpose for these dinners is to create discussion and open up the doors for further dialogue down the line. They are not meant to be high pressure situations. Casual, comfortable and creative are the main ingredients for a good discussion dinner.
Evangelists Anonymous
This type of small group is sort of an evangelism support group that meets together to pray for, encourage, brainstorm, and keep each member accountable in their personal one-on-one evangelism efforts in their respective spheres of influence, whether that be at the workplace, in the school, or in the neighbourhood. As members help and encourage each other in this endeavour, all will become more motivated and skilled in their own efforts. Suggestions for increasing skills and growing in vision may be for the group to be reading through some helpful books on ‘lifestyle’ and ‘friendship’ evangelism (Green, 1995; Petersen, 1989; Pippert, 1979), going through a video learning series (Petersen, 1989), studying biblical patterns of mission, going to related seminars, reading through a book that links prayer and evangelism, expanding our knowledge of the world’s religions (Smith, 1991), apologetics (Boyd & Boyd, 1994; Little, 1988), etc. If at all possible, opportunities to enter into each other’s social circles should be encouraged.
The Partiers
This small team of five or six folks focuses on giving each other opportunities to connect with and engage each other’s friends with the good news by merging their social circles together. These people like to party and socialize. They’re always having dinners, movie nights, going out bowling, playing hockey, and going away to the cottage on weekends. Or perhaps this small team loves to cook, play scrabble, watch movies, or perhaps play cards. They are always including their non-Christian friends so that their friendship networks begin to overlap. In other words, the focus here is on social cross-pollination. The potential here lies in the synergistic and overlapping efforts and talents of each team member with each other’s non-kingdom friends. The breakthrough that I’ve been working on with a friend may not come until they connect with another member of the team who perhaps understands them more and is able to connect at a deeper level. What we have here really is the emergence of a community made up of overlapping social circles, with Christians and non-Christians alike, that creates opportunities to dialogue on life, faith, family, work, sports, suffering, and Jesus.
Service Oriented Groups
This small team starts off, say, as a run-of-the-mill Bible study meeting once a week on Wednesday nights. But then one of them noticed that there is something wrong in town – homeless people in the streets, food banks running low on donations, soup kitchens needing volunteers. This guy then rallied a few friends from the bible study, and they decided they needed to make a difference, somehow.
They start praying, thinking, and doing some research. They come up with the idea of opening up an emergency last resort overnight shelter for homeless people when all other existing shelters and agencies are full up. They garnered support and advice from existing shelters in town, organized a homeless walk to raise money for their shelter, within a few months were up and running successfully, and were supported greatly by their home church and other agencies with supplies and money. They were able to initially recruit about two dozen volunteers, mostly from their home church but also from the community at large, some of whom were non-Christians.
Although the main goal of the project was to help the homeless, the project not only strengthened the bonds between the Christians involved but has also created opportunities to share in word and deed the good news of Jesus to those around them. This, by the way, is a true story and only one example of the possibilities.
Social Issues Discussion Groups
Many in our society are deeply concerned about social issues and are willing to engage and explore societal problems in conversation. Organizing a discussion group that attempts to address and explore various societal problems can be a way of building bridges between Christians and non-Christians. Typical meetings may simply involve discussing a book, magazine article or newspaper clipping on a certain topic. This provides an opportunity for the believer to learn about issues the church does not address frequently, to formulate and articulate their perspective, and to learn from non-Christians their views on the environment, AIDS, crime, international relations, abortion, euthanasia, genetic engineering, the media, poverty, homelessness, as well as a host of local concerns. It may be surprising to both believers and non-believers that they share many overlapping perspectives, something that can create friendships and a springboard for dialogue on faith issues.
Investigative Bible Studies
This basically involves a small team of Christians organizing a weekly bible study group geared towards our non-Christian friends. Out of some friendships may emerge a few seeker friends who are interested in a more thorough look at the Bible and this guy named Jesus. It’s just a matter of inviting them.
A great approach is certainly one of the gospels, in which we all agree to systematically look through the life of Christ, one chapter at a time on a weekly basis. Other possibilities may be a topical or thematic introductory look at questions like: Who was Jesus? What about science and faith? Why suffering and evil? Is the Bible Reliable? Does God Really Care? Helpful books such as Know Why You Believe (Little, 1988) address a variety of questions that people often ask. As well, introductory courses to the Christian faith such as the ever-popular Alpha Course (Gumbel, 1993), offer a practical and refreshing look at some foundational issues. This Alpha Course is oriented around a meal and lively video presentation, followed by group discussion on the issues addressed.
Final Thoughts
This article has attempted to touch on issues related to small group evangelism and offer some practical tips. There are many types of small groups you could start. Be creative, intentional, sensitive and, above all, trust God to do something through you to touch the lives of people around you.

Acknowledgements
The diagram ‘Evangelism as Fishing’ was adapted and modified based on material from my friend Jeremy Horne who is the director of The Navigators of Canada (Campus Mission).

References & Further Reading
Arnold, J (1992), The Big Book on Small Groups, InterVarsity Press.
Boyd G.A. and E.K. Boyd (1994), Letters from a Skeptic, Chariot Victor Publishing.
Bruce, F.F. (1992), The New Testament Documents: Are They Reliable?, InterVarsity Press.
Coleman, Robert (1963), The Master Plan of Evangelism, Spire Books / Revell.
Green, M., and A. McGrath (1995), How Shall We Reach Them? Thomas Nelson Pub.
Green, Michael (1995), One to One, Random House.
Gumbel, Nicky (1993), Questions of Life, Alpha Course, Cook Ministry Resources.
Little, Paul (1988), Know Why You Believe, InterVarsity Press.
Martin, Walter (1992), The Kingdom of the Cults, Bethany House Publishers.
McDowell, Josh (1977), More Than a Carpenter, Living Books, Tyndale House Publishers.
McDowell, Josh (1988), Evidence That Demands a Verdict (Volume 1) - Historical Evidences for the Christian Faith, Here's Life Publishers.
Petersen, Jim (1989), Living Proof - Sharing the Gospel Naturally, NavPress, Colorado Springs, USA. A video series is available based on the book.
Petersen, Jim (1992), Church without Walls, NavPress.
Pippert, R.M. (1979), Out of the Salt Shaker and Into the World, InterVarsity Press.
Schumacher, E.F. (1973), Small is Beautiful: Economics as if People Mattered, Harper & Row.
Shorrosh, Anis A. (1988), Islam Revealed - A Christian Arab's View of Islam, Thomas Nelson Publishers.
Smith, Huston (1991), The World's Religions, Harper SanFrancisco.
Zdero, Rad (2004), The Global House Church Movement, available from William Carey Library, www.WCLbooks.com
About the Author
Rad Zdero, Ph.D., earned his doctorate in Mechanical Engineering from Queen’s University in Kingston, Canada. He is currently part of a team starting up ‘HouseChurch.Ca’, an umbrella group intent on birthing a network of house churches in the greater Toronto area. Contact Information - Website: www.housechurch.ca, Email: rad@housechurch.ca, Tel: 905-820-8846, Mail: Box 42067, 128 Queen St. South, Mississauga, ON, Canada, L5M-4Z0.

A LETTER FROM JOHN WHITE AND LK10


Hey Dave,
 
Check out our new "community of church planters".  http://lk10.com   This is the primary place where I'm communicating with church planters these days.
 
John
 
John White
Community Coach

Kamis, 11 September 2008

CHURCH IS FAMILY


Church is Family
The New Testament uses certain pictures to describe the church, and each one brings out aspects of our corporate lives together as believers that we need to know about. For instance, we are likened to both a field and a building (1 Corinthians 3v9), to a spiritual house (1 Peter 2v5) and a flock of sheep (Hebrews 13v20). There are other pictures too, and we can profit from the wealth of insight that each gives: but they are clearly not intended to be taken literally. (If any of you feel yourselves to be literally sheaves of corn in a field then perhaps you would sway gently in the wind for a moment or two. Likewise any sheep amongst you might declare yourselves with a corporate'Baahh'.)
 There is, however, one particular picture to which I want to draw special attention, but only to demonstrate that it isn't actually a picture at all, but is meant to be taken and understood quite literally. It is the description in God's Word of Christians being the Lord's family! Throughout the New Testament believers are referred to as brothers and sisters; God is said to be our Father in Heaven, and Jesus is depicted as our brother. And now get this:
'Yet to all who received Him (Jesus), to those who believed on His name, he gave the right to become children of God - children not born of natural descent, nor of human decision or a husband's will, but born of God.'(John 1v12-13)
Not only are we said to be brothers and sisters because we are following the Lord and therefore part of His Church, we have actually become part of that Church by literally being born again into it. What we have here is family, family, family - and it is all quite literal! People who have the same Father and big Brother are all part of the same family; it's as simple and straightforward as that!
And of course this is the defining truth of the Christian Church regardless of which particular mode of its existence one is speaking of; and in this regard we must take a quick look at what the theologians like to refer to as firstly, the Church Universal, and secondly, the Church Militant. Now by Church Universal they mean every believer who has existed, or who does exist, or who will exist. Therefore, in its most comprehensive form, the Christian Church includes believers who are long dead and with the Lord in Heaven, believers who are currently alive, and all those who aren't even born yet but who will follow the Lord in the future. Church Militant, however, is a smaller part of that comprehensive whole and refers to all those Christians currently alive on the earth; and of course this can be broken down even more into believers in whole countries, in geographical areas, in cities and towns and villages, right down to the smallest unit of individual local churches meeting in people's homes. Perhaps we could usefully abandon the traditional jargon though and rather think of it like this:
The Church Throughout Time - Here we have every believer past, present and future!
The Church Throughout Space - This includes every believer alive now in the present moment, wherever they may be.
The Local Church - Individual churches in people's homes,
So, the Word of God tells us that church is family, whether it be the Christian Church Universal (throughout space and time), or part of the Church Militant (throughout space) locally in any one individual and particular corporate gathering in someone's home. God is indeed our Father, and Jesus is our elder brother. And of course if you tie this in as well with the biblical teaching that the Church is those people in whom the Lord lives, then we arrive at the simple, yet unbelievably wonderful truth of the Lord simply living with His family: and living with one's family is the most natural thing in the world! It is revealing too that when Jesus said,'...I will build my church... '(Matthew 16v18) the word used by the apostle for build is oikodomeo, which specifically means to build a house. And of course your house is where you live with your family, and one could legitimately translate this,'...I will build my house, my home, the church...'Everywhere we turn in the New Testament we find the same thing; churches are seen to be extended families of God's children.
This is, after all, all good solid evangelical Bible believing stuff. But what I want to highlight now is the way in which the apostles, unlike the vast majority of believers who have come after them, established churches to not just be extended families of God in theory, but to actually function and live as such in practice. When you turn to the New Testament to enquire as to how churches were set up, and the way in which they functioned, then what you find is that they met on the first day of the week in someone's home in order to talk and fellowship together, to encourage and enjoy one another, and to do so over a meal. They most emphatically did not have a 'church service', or involve themselves in ritualistic religious rigmarole of any kind. They simply came together in order to spend time with each other with the Lord. They talked and they prayed together. They sang songs of praise and worship to the Lord together as well; and they built each other up spiritually by teaching and encouraging one another from the Word of God. And all this they did in the context of eating a meal together in joyful acknowledgement of their guest of honor who, though not present physically, was with them nevertheless by His Spirit empowering them for their service to Him through the week to come. That, and nothing less, is the family of God as described in the pages of the New Testament, and that is why Jesus had the apostles establish churches in the way they did. A family is neither an organization nor a corporation, and if you treat it and have it function as such then you simply destroy everything that it is intended to be.
Can you imagine a family get-together organized on the lines of a religious meeting? Picture it: A senior member of the family stands up the front (of course it's in a public building and not the home of one of the family members) and all else present seat themselves in rows so that the personal contact of being face to face and looking at each other is precluded. From that point onwards all is directed from the front, the 'audience' being allowed varying degrees of involvement and interaction depending on each particular family. At some point the senior family member who is leading from the front gives a speech of varying duration, after which a morsel of bread for each adult present, and little sips of wine or grape juice, are distributed before everyone goes home. (More progressive families might, however, provide a time for coffee and chit-chat afterwards.) Then, happy that duty has been done, and that family responsibilities have been satisfactorily carried out, all return to their individual homes to get on with the rest of the day.
I tell you, that is not my idea of a family gathering; and neither is it the Lord's idea of His extended family meeting together either. What I think of as the shape of churches in the New Testament was both very deliberate, and carefully implemented, and the design was intended precisely to produce personal relationships and mutual interaction, the very thing family is all about. We know from the human biological family unit that if you change its shape from what it was designed by God to be; that is, a married man and a woman in a lifelong mutually loving and serving relationship, then what results is other than what the Lord intended. Families with parents who serve neither each other, nor their children, as they should, or parents who divorce, or families with two daddies or two mummies, all these become what we call dysfunctional families. They are families, to be sure, but they are the wrong shape; and therefore function differently from the way they should. The children suffer most of course, and rather than the security and safety of loving relationships, insecurity, with its corresponding indiscipline, takes over, and anarchy and divisiveness and broken relationships soon follow.
And in precisely the same way, churches which aren't based on the teachings, traditions and practices of Jesus and His apostles are, quite simply, the wrong shape. They are churches, to be sure (assuming, of course, that they are gatherings of genuine believers), but they are dysfunctional churches which don't act like extended families; and for the precise reason that they are not set up to be families, and therefore don't behave or function like families when they meet.
Form follows function, and design must correlate directly with the practical purpose of a thing. Birds are meant to fly and so have wings, whilst fish, being designed for an underwater existence, are provided with both gills and fins. So when the Lord passed on His design for churches to His apostles, it was a design which correlated exactly with what He intended those churches to be: His extended families! Had he intended churches to be organizations, or religious corporations, then we might have expected the blueprint to be somewhat different, but as it stands the New Testament pattern remains that of an extended family, nothing less. Change the pattern, tamper with the design, alter the shape; and you get something completely other than what Jesus either envisioned or intended.
Dysfunctional families are so much less than what they should be! Likewise dysfunctional churches! The Lord intended we grow from spiritual babes into mature believers in a family of a church. He intended we experience security, love, character formation and necessary discipline in a group of brothers and sisters sharing their lives together. My wife and I are so blessed to be the parents of 3 wonderful children. We love them more than we can possibly say, and we love them quite unconditionally. Our relationship with them is primarily that of fun and laughter, and of teaching them all the wonderful things they need to know: but part of it too is the need for the discipline of child-training and character building, and even at times, though it gives us no pleasure, punishment when they have been naughty. But the point is that they receive any such measures from the very people who love them quite unconditionally, their parents. We don't love them any less when they are being bad, and neither do we love them any more when they are being good. We just love them absolutely, and quite unconditionally, to bits. And so it is too with being part of a church that is based on the New Testament and which lives just like an extended family. The task of discipling and correcting each other, of spurring one another on to live holy lives, is meant to be in the context of brothers and sisters; of close friends who are all ultimately struggling with the same problems and weaknesses, and who can therefore support, sympathize and identify with each other in all things.
Here is safety! Here is security! Here is reality! The reality of actually living as if we are the Lord's family! And for the simple reason that we quite literally are. It's safe, so very, very safe! And it's so safe because it's all based on the love the Lord has for us, a love as unconditional and as lacking in condemnation as you can get. Our unspeakably deep need, as human beings, for belonging is met here; met in being part of a little local extended family of God - known otherwise in scripture as a church!
So there you have it - the church as family! Indeed, the church is a family! The very extended family of God! And that, and that alone, is the reason why churches in the New Testament were established in the particular way that they were. Let's remind ourselves of what we have seen thus far concerning what I am calling the shape of biblical churches:
• Believers met as churches on any day of the week
• When churches came together on any day of the week they met in houses.
• When believers came together in each others houses as churches their corporate worship and sharing together was completely open and spontaneous with no one leading from the front. Indeed, in a lounge in a house there isn't a 'front' for anyone to lead from. Remember, the early believers didn't have anything that came anywhere near even looking like a 'church service'.
• As part of their proceedings they ate the Lord's Supper as a full meal; indeed, as their main meal of the day, commonly referring to it as the love-feast.
• They understood each church to be an extended family unit (the idea of churches being institutions or organizations would have been totally alien to them), and practiced non-hierarchical plural male leadership that arose from within the church it would subsequently lead. This indigenous eldership (elder, pastor/ shepherd, bishop/overseer being synonymous terms in the New Testament) sought to lead consensually wherever possible, and was understood to be purely functional and not in any way positional.
Think about it for one moment! It's perfect, isn't it! Churches are meant to be extended families, and so the Word of God gives us the pattern of how they are to function and operate. And when we look at that blueprint and pattern then what do we find? We find a family gathering in every sense of the term. God is our Father, Jesus is our big brother, and those others in the church are our brothers and sisters. Wow! I like that! And so, it seems, does Jesus! It was, after all, His idea in the first place!

Minggu, 07 September 2008


An Emerging Church-Planting Movement in North America

by Mike Steele

A Worldwide Viewpoint.

Some things become painfully obvious when seen in the light of solid information. For years the Church in the United States has been in a constant state of decline with no end in sight. Our neighbors to the north, Canada, have seen an increase in church starts beginning in 1997. Gatherings of believers are multiplying around the world at an unprecedented rate. While Church planting movements flourished in other countries, here in the States we continued to see a massive drop in church starts.

I have been privileged to work with Dawn ministries for a decade. I had become acquainted with DAWN through a world-wide survey I had been commissioned to do for the AD2000 and Beyond Movement. Getting a picture of what God was doing around the world, seeing the massive growth of the church worldwide, led me to give my life fully to the idea of seeing a gathering of believers (a church) within easy access of very person of every class, kind and condition of mankind. That led ultimately to being invited to join Dawn Ministries. Early assignments with Dawn took me to ministry in parts of Africa, Asia, Europe, the Caribbean and Latin America before I began facilitating the work of Dawn in North America. Through this opportunity, I was able to see church planting movements happening on several continents.

The DAWN—Discipling A Whole Nation—strategy for mobilizing the whole Body of Christ in whole nations to work most directly at completing the Great Commission is now being implemented in about 150 nations around the world. DAWN suggests an approach that begins in prayer, utilizes information, and works continually in process toward the filling of the nation with gatherings of believers. It leads the Church to pursue a prophetic message from the Lord for the peoples of the land toward filling the land with disciples and disciple making communities..

DAWN Philippines, where it all began in 1974, has celebrated the fulfillment of its goal to increase from about 5,000 congregations in 1975 to 50,000 by the end of AD 2000.

Likewise, the Church in Zimbabwe has completed its project of doubling their 10,000 churches to 20,000 in a ten-year period. In the process, they saw 1.6 million come to Christ and into church membership. This represents fully 20 percent of the whole population coming into the Kingdom in this very brief period!

Fourteen nations in Latin America have planted a total of 87,500 new churches since 1992, five of them reaching their goals ahead of time. Venezuela, for example, previously had the lowest growth rate in the whole region. In 1992 the church leaders in Venezuela established a goal to increase from 4,900 congregations to 12,000 by AD 2002. They reached their goal in 1998 and set a new goal of 25,000 total churches by AD 2005. Meeting in Miami in 1999, the combined national Churches of the whole Latin region set a goal to plant 500,000 more churches in the ten years to follow.

Similarly, amazing things have been happening in both China and India with projections of new churches growing by leaps and bounds. In just one small province alone in one of these countries, application of the DAWN strategy resulted in the number of churches increasing from three to 550 and the number of believers from 100 to 55,000 in just five years. That exploded again in the next two years to 1,250 churches and 225,000 members.

Vibrant young leaders in another far eastern country were half way into their project of planting 30,000 new churches among an unreached people group, previously the largest unreached people group in the world. Across the Middle East—where, until recently, getting a convert or two on occasion was possible but where starting new churches was hardly ever mentioned—actual church-planting projects were underway.

As of October 2003, the DAWN vision has been a factor in over 1,050,000 churches being planted in more than 100 nations in the last ten years. In the first three years of the new century, plans have been laid in over 110 countries for the planting of more than 12 million new congregations in the next decade. Hundreds of volunteer DAWN associates carry a heart for the completion of the Great Commission and a burden to see their nations saturated with the presence of Christ in the form of local gatherings of believers. Yet, in this country, most have never heard of DAWN nor of such movements as those I mentioned above nor others popping up in many places around the world. .

America – The Exception to the Trend

Five years ago, I began to criss-cross the nation, following the Holy Spirit, in search of answers for mobilizing a church planting movement in the Church of America. In the process, I talked with thousands of pastors, read dozens of books, prayed agonizing prayers.

The facts spoke loudly. Hundreds of thousands of churches were half full each Sunday with little prospect of dynamic new growth. Well known researchers are speaking of at least 80 % of the church being stagnant or declining in growth. Yet few church leaders would entertain the notion of a fresh move of God in our land. It is no wonder that a high percentage of pastors in a poll indicated they would get out of the ministry if they could.

America – Last of the Giants

Jim Montgomery of Dawn Ministries had used this phrase to describe the United States as the one place where it would take a miracle of God to see a DAWN type saturation church planting project. Imagine trying to get the Church of America to join in what would appear to be yet another campaign to evangelize the nation. Hadn’t every local church at some point thrown its energies and resources into a cooperative effort that in the long run produced little or no new growth for their congregation? There are at least two instances where Jim and others made an effort to share the concepts of a church planting movement in the United States to no avail. Dawn’s work in the US had proved to be hopeful at best. Many attempts to cast vision to pastors and church leaders across the land had been met with a cold reception. Jim often spoke of America as being the last place to see a Dawn type project occur.

Misperceptions

American Christians tend to believe we are the most churched country in the world. The reality, however, is that the United States is the fourth largest unchurched population in the world. It also became obvious that much of what we had identified as Church in the United States had very little chance of multiplying and filling the nation with the glory of God. While there were perhaps 3,000 mega churches that were filling their pews, for instance, I observed that many of those attending were little more than spectators. Most neighborhood churches see gatherings between 40 and 80 people. And most of those churches haven’t baptized a new member in years.

Something in the structure of Church that had worked so well for our parents had lost its glimmer in this post-modern world. It wasn’t reproducing disciples who walked in the love of the Lord and set their world on fire. It just wasn’t authentic or real anymore to this “emerging” generation. It was viewed by many as a system of do’s and don’ts, as legalistic and controlling. While it is reaching some, its ability to transform culture and reach two hundred million people is seriously in question.

It seemed to me that the culture in North America had changed dramatically over the past century, but the Church had not caught up. In fact, the church now looked and acted in large measure, just like the culture. Our measure of success and our system of validation and affirmation matches the business models of our day. True life in Christ and the joy of community in Christ have faded on many fronts. The tremendous move of God around the world is being thwarted in the U.S. by what had become “Standard American Churchianity”.

My persistent prayer was, “Lord, how can we impact the millions of people who have either left the Church or won’t go to it?” In response, the Lord began to paint a picture of “church” that was new, refreshing, able to multiply by becoming “all things to all men” in order to reach the masses that wanted a relationship with Jesus but needed a new door to enter through. It wasn’t so much about structure as it was about a way of life.

Then the Lord reminded me of the old saying, “All roads lead home.” Jesus summed up all that was written when He encouraged us to fall in love with His Father and let that love flow through our families and spheres of influence. I realized that the problem in the American church was centered on the decline in true intimacy with the Father and in the understanding of nurturing communities where life and love is shared and freely expressed among the beloved. Our hearts are broken and only the love of the Father can heal them.

Ultimately, the Lord began to connect me with a network of men and women similarly passionate about the health of the church and the re-discipling of our nation.

We had the strong impression the Lord was leading us to some answers. We began seeing glimpses of what he was doing in out-of-the way places here and there. Could it be these scattered, unconnected oases in the desert held the answers to what we were looking for?

Emerging movements

In this process of observing the overall church culture in America that seemed inadequate at best to move up to another level of growth and impact, we began to bump into little movements that appeared to be making an impact in their spheres. While a few were in rebellion against the status quo, a new growing group of believers had begun to model biblical community, earnestly seeking the mind of the Lord for his people.

These small networks in various parts of the country had been developing a thought process revolving around the idea of church-planting movements. They were not all using the same terminology, but there seemed to be a common DNA. The three main strands of their DNA were:
1) The Word
2) Nurturing Relationships in communities
3) The Mission of the Kingdom.

The idea of living every day with Jesus and each other was a common thread. Their belief in a 24/7 relationship with God and people led them to see structure as a secondary issue. “Church” IS the people and happened in the midst of the people.

Several of these networks became acquainted and began to share together their ideas of relational community They are investing in a discipleship process much in the style of Jesus’ model of discipleship. They are living relationally with each other. And they are growing!

While still in its infancy, the last three years have yielded a growth rate that is off the charts. In 2000, we were aware of about five such networks of three to five gatherings each that exhibited simple/organic concepts. By 2003 there were over 75 such networks that we knew of, with the number of gatherings well exceeding 1,000. Every week people are calling or emailing us to say they have caught the idea and are starting their own gatherings and networks.

One Body, One Bride, One Family

These new expressions of “church’ believe there is but one Body in many
expressions. Larry Kreider in his book, “House Church Networks” states, “House churches, and churches of any kind, should never be exclusive entities cut off from the rest of the body of Christ. The healthy house church will focus on loving the Lord, loving each other, reaching the lost and loving the rest of the body of Christ anywhere and everywhere. Healthy believers will want to relate closely to the rest of the body of Christ
because they want to be “one with the Father and each other.”

Rather than living in isolation they see themselves as another extension of all that God is doing in the world. Furthermore, they see the opportunity to partner with more traditional models of “church” to saturate a city or state with the presence of Christ.

These new simple church networks were looking for a way of “being” the church that could be embraced by multitudes of pastors, denomination leaders and the average man and woman in the pew. They were praying for a paradigm that would be perceived as a prophetic word from the Lord that would be immediately seized by the early adopters and carried into the bulk of the Body of Christ in America. This way of life can be lived out in any grouping of the Body of Christ and bring everyone closer to God and each other.

What do they look like?

Some of these small movements seemed quite exotic in nature. As told in the DAWN REPORT Magazine, for example, I had recently met with a wonderful group of young people in their twenties who had begun multiplying house churches in Las Vegas, Nevada. In the heart of “sin city,” they were gathering bar waitresses, card dealers and hotel employees in their homes. Finding a place of acceptance and healing, many would come and participate even before they had come to know the Lord.

In a short period of time, they were already meeting in 15 different locations. Later I learned that one of their team had planted six new gatherings in just three weeks. They had developed their mission statement to read “We exist to see a church within walking distance of every person in Las Vegas and we exist to see a church-planting movement in every major city of the United States.”

In nearby Los Angeles, likewise not noted for its piety, I met with a similar group of leaders. They have developed a training program they call “Greenhouse”. They also developed the DNA model now expressed across this nationwide relational network. They reminded people that healthy time with Jesus and each other would lead to natural reproduction (evangelism). Many who are responding to this approach were in their 20’s and come from fractured backgrounds. One young man I met was an ex-drug dealer who is now planting a house church in the very neighborhood where he used to make his illicit living. Others are planting churches in various alternate lifestyle communities.

One of their approaches is to multiply “Life Transformation Groups.” Each LTG is made up of three people who: 1) read 30 chapters of scripture a week, 2) confess theirs sins for cleansing and healing, and 3) pray for a friend to join them.

When a new friend joins the group of three, it now becomes two groups of two asking the Lord to bring a third to each. Using this model, they had planted over 200 gatherings in the last few years

While these networks were joining together relationally, another expression of the movement was emerging. God brought the Dales from England some 5 years ago. They had been a part of a growing movement in England in the 70’s and 80’s. God laid on their heart to produce a magazine to catalyze what many were thinking and thousands responded. Last years final issue reached 50,000 copies. It became a point of connection and validation for many to see God at work. They also spawned a network in their hometown. They have raised leaders to give facilitation to this network and are now engaged in sharing the vision across the nation and the world.

One pioneer had been pursuing a multiplying model state by state across the whole country. Robert Fitts had already been planting house churches for over 12 years. Robert has faithfully shared the message of “simple life” in Christ with thousands. In the last year, Robert has developed a relational network, OFI, in 16 states which has over 100 gatherings.

In Dallas, Cincinnati, Seattle, Portland, Denver, Colorado Springs, parts of New Hampshire, Maryland and in many more states, these networks are springing up sharing a simple message of love in Christ and love with each other..


Growth of the simple church movement

This year, 2003, brought with it a pleasant surprise. Many who had long been in traditional denominations began to ask what it would look like to see these simple expressions of “church” emerge through their denominational channels. It seems that the Holy Spirit is speaking these truths into multiple spheres of influence all at once. We like to say that this is a sign that the Holy Spirit is the initiator. Some had been doing serious study of the Church in America and rethinking biblical models of church. Their desire was to touch the perceived needs of American believers and unbelievers alike. Furthermore, they were implementing models of church that fit the above criteria and that were beginning to see multiplication through discipleship and nurturing community life.

None of these networks, of course, have yet achieved the kind of growth I have described from nations overseas. Still, I see a new wind blowing across the land. To the glory of God, this simple-church movement appears to be a cloud the size of a man’s fist that promises a deluge of a new discipleship and church-planting thrust in our troubled land.

What is simple church?

We at Dawn Ministries believe the evidence is there that God is raising up a movement that will bring a whole new vitality, empowerment and expansion to the Church in North America. Though referred to by such terms as organic church, New Testament church, house church, redemptive community, oikos, lighthouse or other terms, an umbrella name we use is “simple church.”

A simple definition of simple church could be, “Simple church is a small group of people seeking intimate relationship with God and each other through hearing from God and living the Kingdom lifestyle.”

From such a kernel definition, we see God developing many different models and expressions of the Body. We are aware of a number of different models that are all built on this core expression of simple church. Others seem to pop up quite regularly.

Since this new paradigm for doing church in America is spontaneously springing up in many forms, in many places and developed by many different leaders, there is naturally a plethora of names by which it is identified.

We have searched for a common phrase for all such gatherings and have come up with “simple church.” Simple in the sense that any believer, emphasizing the priesthood of all believers, could say, “I could do that.”

As Neil Cole writes, "Simplicity is the key to fulfilling the Great Commission in this generation. If the process is complex it will break down early in the transference to the next generation of disciples. The more complex the process the greater the giftedness needed to keep it going. The simpler the process the more available it is to the Christian population. . . . We must keep the message simple and unencumbered by complex methodologies or structures.”

Definitions from Webster's Dictionary
• Simplicity - That which is simple.
• Simple - consisting of few parts, without any or much ornamentation, sophistication or complexity.
• Essential - Necessary, something that one cannot do without it. Of the utmost importance. Relating to or arising from the real nature of a thing or person. Containing all that is best or most important in a thing. As perfect as the mind can conceive. The basic or fundamental part of a thing.

Bindu Choudrie, an Indian church planter says, "If you believe in and love Jesus and can read, you can lead a house (simple) church." We could view the progression as follows: Every believer a church planter, every house (family) a church, every church building a training center.

This is church in its most natural and simplest state of being.

Every family a church

God wants every one of His people, I believe, to be vehicles, channels of His blessing. We have to understand what is essential for church so that every one of us can do it and be an integral part of it.

For years, the Body of Christ in Western Culture has assumed that Church is a major event requiring great expertise to lead. We have missed the essential truth that God fully intended Adam and Eve to be the foundational model for the Church. Church was meant to begin, and to be lived out, in the family. The simplest and most primary expression of the Church is the family. The essential building blocks for the Body of Christ are healthy spiritual parents giving birth to healthy spiritual sons and daughters who give birth to healthy spiritual families. Healthy families will naturally reproduce and multiply.

It's a paradigm shift. It's a whole new way of thinking about what church is, and who we are, and what God's purposes are for us.

The key concept is really not a matter of planting a church in your home, rather it is realizing that your family already is a church, and then begin to function accordingly. Jesus said where two or three are gathered in My name there I am in the midst. This includes everyone in His family, (Redeemed by His blood). It does not exclude anyone, (Singles, fatherless, etc.). The issue is realizing that your family already is the church.


Along with this new way of thinking is an old way of looking at “family”. In earlier times, people were linked together in community. Extended family was always present. It included aunts and uncles, cousins and next of kin. It ALSO included, neighbors, friends, co-workers and employees. Singles who hear the word family often feel excluded because our current model of family is nuclear in definition. Simple church uses the broadest sense of the term to join people together from every walk of life.

What about Structures?

Simple church is infinitely flexible. You can do it any place, any time, any where with anybody. It begins with two people and Jesus. You don't necessarily need a "church" building. In England they meet in pubs. In Africa, under the trees.

One significant question most people ask has to do with family structure. The idea of the church as an extended family often gets tangled in our culture’s expression of a nuclear family model. In Bible times, an extended family was, simply put, all those in your sphere of influence. Therefore, simple churches can flow out of relationships in any grouping of people. Simple church can be started with a group of singles committed to follow the Father and care for each other. It can start with as small a “group” as husband and wife and move up from there to gatherings of nuclear families, households, extended families, people within a sphere of influence, groups of families, oikos, ethne, clan, tribe affinity group. It is people loving God and each other.

Another structural question has to do with our current forms of church. Most people think of the church as a place and event at a certain time. Since simple church is about people, where they meet is secondary. The important idea does not revolve around a building or a meeting place but a lifestyle. When they do gather they could be in cells, house churches, neighborhood churches, mega churches and so on. Simple church is at the core of life in Christ, no matter the structure used for the gathering of the saints together. Simple church is about being “church” not going to “church”.

What’s Ahead

A relational network of simple church gatherings is exploding all around the country. Though it takes many forms, shapes and sizes, at a heart level, simple church is a way to experience Kingdom life lived out in relational intimacy with God and with fellow believers. In its purest form, simple church is mom and dad living the life of Christ in the home. It can be experienced in one family, a neighborhood gathering, the cell of a larger congregation, an affinity group or other small gathering. It is characterized by outreach to the unsaved, by reproducing every time the group reaches about 15, by participation by all in the gathering, and by the absence of need for ordained professional clergy or separate buildings. Imagine what a mega church would look like with all their families living out a simple church lifestyle? You would see hundreds of families incarnating the love and presence of Christ in their neighborhoods daily. The Kingdom alive and incarnating the presence of Christ in the midst of the people in a community would be a tremendous example of the love of Christ touching every part of life.

The essentials of Simple Church affect real life! It's going to be a source of life for you, for your family, for your neighbors and for your whole neighborhood! Church happens 24/7, all week long! If you set out to start a church, it is common to put the church in front of family. But, if you start out to be God's people as a family, and bless each other, (and you can do that), then other people will just naturally be drawn in, and it won't take a toll on your family.

At the start of this chapter I shared that God has been moving through His Body around the world for at least the last 15-20 years in a new and pervasive way. It may just be the season for the Church in the United States to join this work of the Holy Spirit around the world and enjoy the life of the Kingdom in this country. Preliminary informal research shows there are now over 75 networks in 18 states that have simple church gatherings. All this has been birthed in the last three years. We hope and pray that 2004 will be a year that diverse groups within the Body of Christ see this new expression as a forerunner of the changes the Holy Spirit would like to bring in this land. It is our sincere belief that we are on the verge of a significant movement of God in North America that will spawn healthy, multiplying “extended families” all across our nation.

For more information on this fledgling church planting movement, visit our website at www.dawnministries.org/regions/nam/index.html.

Kamis, 04 September 2008

SPIRITUAL DAD?


John Fenn, Spiritual dad?

Hi all,
This Sunday being Father's Day in the US there have been many articles written and a lot of talk either bemoaning the lack of spiritual fathers in the church or calling on men to become spiritual fathers. Some have even blamed the eccentricities of the Lakeland meetings on the lack of spiritual fathers - but I can tell you why there aren't many around in the traditional church structure, tell you why that is, and tell you where to find them.
 
First the problem, then the answer, so bear with me.
 
Core mentality - Program based fatherhood
A spiritual father is an animal of such rarity in traditional churches he isn't well defined or known. But the elusive creature is found in great numbers in house-based churches.
 
The answer for the traditional structure is of course another program. Develop a program, open up the church, do something that puts men and young men together 1 night a week and call it a spiritual fatherhood program - or better yet offer a class on spiritual fatherhood or series of sermons on the subject.
 
The traditional church has failed to produce spiritual fathers because their structure cannot develop the relationships spiritual parenting requires.
 
A father, reproducing DNA
A father and mother conceive a child, and that child has their parent's DNA as a result. A spiritual father and mother seek to impart Christ's DNA and their life experience with Him into their spiritual children in the same way parents grow their children - in relationship with each other, walking through life together.
 
What would happen if a regular mom and dad could only contact their children through a school program instead of directly to them as unique individuals? Can you imagine if a parent had to contact the coach or principle or could only see their child at a ball game or cheerleader practice? That's no way to parent is it? Parenting requires one on one relationships walking through life together, imparting wisdom and experience.
 
Then why do we express dismay when program based relationships in the traditional churches fail to produce true spiritual children and parents, let alone people on fire for God?
 
The traditional church is not structured to produce person to person relationships; it is structured to produce person to program relationships.
 
Furthermore, it is structured to reproduce itself not people. It's effect is more people trained to have relationships only through a church program.
 
This means the traditional church itself tries to be the spiritual father (and mother) of it's members, and when it fails, people become very hurt as they would if their parents hurt them. How many people struggled in their faith or fell away from the Lord when Jim Bakker and Jimmy Swaggart fell from grace in the late 1980's? Their faith wasn't in God; their faith was in man and his programs, so when they fell, so did many a believer.
 
The traditional church relates to it's spiritual children through performance based Christianity measured by how much you give, how much you attend, and how active you are in the programs offered. It is no different than the parent who lays down the law for his/her kids- this produces children angry and distant from their parents even as our culture is filled with angry teens and adults distance from God.
 
In fact, my experience has been that many who fall away from God don't actually fall from Christ, but the church. Most of these people they think the only way to know God is through the traditional church and its programs because that's all they know or have been told.They think the local church is the intermediary between man and God.
 
In the traditional church structure the only relationships promoted are those which are program based. The program is the intermediary through which everyone in a traditional church functions and without programs there are no relationships between congregation members - if you are involved in a church program and another person you hit it off with is in that same program, unless you work very hard at it, your relationship with them begins and ends when that program begins and ends.
 
Thus, when a person leaves a traditional church they find they have no real friends. They thought they did, but to their horror and surprise they found out their 'friends' were only as deep as their involvement with the church programs. Take away the program and no relationship exists unless they actually decide to get together outside of church to get to know one another.
 
Where are the emperor's clothes?
Here's news for leaders in the traditional church - what I just shared above is what teenagers and twentysomething's perceive at first glance, and they want nothing to do with a fatherhood manifested through the surrogacy of a program. They want real people who will talk about real issues who will help walk them through real life. The big news is that all us old people are seeing the same thing, we just search for it more subtly and in a reasoned way while the youth are quite vocal about the emperor not having any clothes.
 
Yet the traditional church leaders cry out for spiritual fathers, never realizing their structure is the very thing that prevents it!
 
To say a spiritual father is a mentor does not go far enough. To say they impart good principles into those young in the faith, falls short. To say they are a coach to a younger person in the Lord person is yet further from the truth. Yet all these things are church program based definitions and efforts to develop spiritual fatherhood and bridge generation gaps.
 
Drum roll please...
It's difficult for some to define exactly what a spiritual father is because few have seen the real thing. So let's look at the similarities between a father as head of a family and a spiritual father.
 
A spiritual father has a 1 on 1 direct relationship with their 'child' in the faith, rather than a relationship with that person through a program. If a traditional church offers programs through which relationships are governed, it's mirror image in the family is the absentee father who gives money and presents to his kids but never actually gives himself. The money and gifts become the program upon which the relationship is based, while the kids are just crying out for their dad. As a result, millions of young people are crying out for a relationship with God minus the programs and structured hoops they have to jump through in the traditional church.
 
Father's live with those they are fathering.
Being a bio-dad is not necessarily a father. There are many bio-dads who have never been fathers to their children, and there are many men who are truly fathers to another's children. It is the man who lives with and shares his life with those children who is their father.
 
Paul called himself a spiritual father of the Corinthian church. Acts 18 records he stayed 18 months with them at it's founding, and went back at least 3 times after that. He said they have had many teachers, but he was their spiritual father. He lived among the people imparting himself to them. Of his time in Ephesus he said "I held nothing back - literally 'with unfurled sails' - I proclaimed it to you and taught you publicly and from house to house." (Acts 20: 20)
 
The traditional church has been teaching and preaching fatherhood through various programs for generations, thinking teaching at them is parenting. But as Paul noted, being a teacher to people does not a spiritual parent make.  
 
A traditional church says "I'm teaching you what is right, now go out and do it" with no other example than some sermons or textbook. Spiritual fathers demonstrate their faith alongside the person. They don't give the kid a book on how to bait a hook and send him off until next week; they go fishing with them!
 
Am I saying a spiritual father has to camp out on a young disciple's doorstep? No. I am saying there is an ongoing mentoring relationship and much communication as both parties walk through life in relationship.
 
Fathers provide for their children.
In the same way a natural father works hard for his family, a spiritual parent works hard to meet the emotional, spiritual, and practical needs of their spiritual child.
 
Why spiritual parents are found in house based churches
Let me first say that a house church is not a miniature of the traditional church. Just meeting in a home is not a house church.
 
A house church is defined by scripture. If a small group has a meeting in a home that could just as easily be in the Crystal Cathedral or First Church on the corner, they are following a traditional format established by Emperor Constantine 1700 years ago, not the Bible, and are not a house church.
 
A house church as defined by scripture is a family based, discussion oriented, discipleship focused community of disciples committed to one another by meeting (at least) weekly in a format that allows God to move according to His desire. Relationships develop, people meet during the week or socialize together, and in a meeting they are bound by love and the desire to see God's will done in each life.
 
There are no programs through which relationships are controlled. As I often say: In the traditional church we formed a structure and then tried to breathe life into it. In house church we find where God's life is already present and moving, then form just enough structure (if needed) to facilitate that life. (and if life moves in another direction the minimalist structure can move with it)
 
Relationships that are founded upon families move organically from within, rather than by external programs designed to manipulate people into coming together. It takes time. It takes the risk of getting to know each other, having meals together, visiting in each other's homes - it's more a lifestyle than anything else.
 
It is what you've heard me say for years; Relationship Based Christianity (not program based Christianity).
 
In house church the kids present know everyone as a friend and extended family, so they see multiple examples of fathers and mothers who love their children, love and respect each other, and properly interact with others of all ages.
 
A few years ago I asked for prayer in one of our house church meetings, so naturally all the kids joined in with the adults to lay hands on me and pray. One 4 year old boy laid hands on me along with everyone else, only his hand was about my shin level. After a time of prayer a couple people had a prophecy for me and he did too.  In his cute 4 year old voice he tugged on my pants leg and said: "The Lord is saying he loves you and is happy with you, that's all."
 
That prophecy has stayed with me - he had the freedom to pray and move as God moved him, showing me an example to stay child-like in my faith, simple, innocent, and free to share what God puts on the heart.
 
That would never happen in a program based traditional structure.
 
The apostle John wrote this in I John 2:13: "I write to you fathers because you have known Him who is from the beginning. I write to you young men, because you have overcome the wicked one. I write to you little children, because you have known the Father."
 
Notice that the little children know the Father, and they become young men who are all about fighting and overcoming the wicked one - and that zeal and hunger is needed. But in relationship with those stages of life are the fathers who know Him who is from the beginning - indicating a camaraderie with age and wisdom and time. The old men share a perspective only experience and deep knowledge can impart.
 
The young in Christ are strong, they have overcome - and they need a spiritual dad, someone they are in relationship with 1 on 1, to guide them into living out those victories they've earned each step of the way.
 
That isn't going to happen in a program, but it does in a living room as multiple generations get to know one another and develop strong friendships as they all move on in the discipleship process together.
 
Some thoughts,
Blessings,
John Fenn
www.ifaithhome.org
 
 

Rabu, 03 September 2008

COMFY CHRISTIANITY


Comfy Christianity
(I have been rather neglectful of this blog recently because of time spent writing a book.  It's not that I think another book is necessarily needed on simple/house churches.  Rather, we have found that when we travel overseas we often want to leave material behind.  By writing our own material we can print and distribute it inexpensively since there is no cut for the publisher.  The following article comes from one of the chapters of this book).
Comfy Christianity
Shane Claiborne writes: “Being a Christian is about choosing Jesus and deciding to do something incredibly daring with your life.”
In my former life as a pastor, I was a dispenser of comfortable Christianity. I took on the job of creating a “conducive environment” for worship. What this really meant was making a worship event cushy enough that people would want to come and then come back: comfortable seats, coffee, pleasing worship music, and a sermon that holds attention. Unfortunately, regularly attending a comfortable worship event has become the primary marker of what it means to be a Christian today.
In fact, we often replace the miraculous adventure of following Jesus with religious activity. Did I go to church this week? Check it off the list. Did I read my Bible? Check it. Did I pray? Check it. Done! I have completed my Christian activities and am, therefore, a “good Christian.” Religion itself becomes an easy replacement for a daring life lived in partnership with Jesus.
Ironically, Jesus drew a startling line in the sand in response to someone who wanted to follow him: "Foxes have holes and birds of the air have nests, but the Son of Man has no place to lay his head (Matthew 18:20).” Jesus was not a dispenser of comfortable Christianity. Quite the opposite. He taught that followers would live a lifestyle of stepping outside of comfort zones in order to join him in the adventure of extending the life of the kingdom.
Replacing “Come-Structures” with “Go-Structures”
Part of our comfy Christianity has been to focus most of our Christian activities within the four-walls where our friends and other Christians hang out. The result is that we reach out to others by inviting them to come join us where we are.
My fellow-blogger, Hamo, comments on this:
If Jesus were alive today and his mission was still to seek out and save the lost what might he do?
Would he hire a building, set up a sound system, develop a music team, drama team, and then do local letterbox drops advising people that they could come and be part of his church on Sunday?
Was it ever Jesus’ intention that non Christians should seek us and desire to attend our worship events? Or didn’t he say quite clearly that it was his calling, and now ours to seek out and save the lost; to go to their world and enculturate the gospel there. Little Bo Peep evangelism (leave ‘em alone and they’ll come home) is fast running out of steam…
Recapturing the “Going” Church
The church’s true nature is best seen by the life that Jesus modeled: he took the life of the kingdom everywhere that he went—out into the world that he was ministering to. In the process of going, he healed, loved, delivered, and shared good news.
God’s heart is missional at the core as he seeks to recover his children who are lost to him. Jesus came to “seek and to save the lost.” This is not a sidebar. God, because of his love, is a caring, reaching God.
The church is becoming unleashed as Christians are re-discover the daring adventure of “going” and taking the presence (love, life, and power) of God everywhere that they are going. Jesus called us to a lifestyle that would take us out of our comfort zone and into the adventure of miraculous living as we extend ourselves to extend his kingdom.
As Jim Rutz wrote, “The bleachers are beginning to empty as 707 million action-oriented Christians start to pour out onto the playing field and discover the joy and challenge of every-member ministry.”
But What About the Gathering?
In conferences and conversations all over the world about simple/house church, it seems that people usually want to learn first about “how to gather.” This is natural since we have thought about “church” as being mostly about events and gatherings. The problem is that though we can replace larger events and gatherings with smaller ones, our motivation may still be to hang out with our Christian friends and, again, seek to reach others by inviting them to join us.
By focusing first on the gathering we miss the point that Jesus’ focus was first on the going way of life. If gatherings develop that support a dynamic, outward, supernatural lifestyle, then the gatherings will be powerful and relevant. However, if gatherings become a replacement for the true adventure of Jesus-following (which can easily happen), then we will again regress into a comfortable Christianity with little life in it.
Stepping Out Makes Life Worth Living
Most of the truly defining moments of our lives take place because we are willing to step out and trust that God has more for us. Rarely do we find new life by holding back or retreating into our familiar, comfort zones. If this entire book accomplishes nothing else, I hope it will inspire someone to listen and follow a very adventurous God into some new horizons.
Pete Greig wrote:
Christ is not a passive Savior sitting in some cosmic comfy chair. Our God is dynamic; He is a creative force, the ultimate visionary, always on the move, and if we want to know Him and be with Him, we will have to follow Him wherever he is going next.