Shocking Beliefs of D.L. Moody
May 25, 2015 by
Frank Viola
“God never gives us discernment in order that we may criticize, but that we may intercede.”
~ Oswald Chambers
If you’re new to the “Shocking Beliefs” series, I’ll open this post by quoting from the preface to the first installment on the
Shocking Beliefs of C.S. Lewis.
This explains why – precisely – I’m producing this series.
A
well-known Christian author whom I greatly respect encouraged me to
begin a series on the shocking beliefs of some of the great Christians
who have impacted church history.
Every
follower of Jesus is a rough draft. Over time, the great Editor – the
Holy Spirit – shapes our lives and views. But until we see the Lord and
“know even as we are known,” we’re are in process.
This is also true for those Christians who have gone before us.
Therefore,
one of the mistakes that we must guard against is to dismiss a person’s
entire contribution because they may hold (or have held) to ideas that
we find hard to stomach.
Speaking
personally, if I demanded that a person’s views on every subject under
the sun be identical to mine as a condition to be helped by them, then
if I had met myself 20 years ago, I’d have to disfellowship myself!
The truth is, my views on some topics have changed over the years.
And so have yours.
Point:
we are all in process. None of us gets everything right all the time.
That stands true for every Christian who has ever breathed oxygen.
So my purpose in highlighting some of “the shocking beliefs” of those upon whose shoulders we all stand is not to burn these folks in effigy. Nor is it to dismiss their positive contribution to church history.
Rather,
it’s to demonstrate that even though they may have held to views that
would raise the eyebrows of most evangelicals today, that doesn’t
overturn nor negate the valuable ideas they contributed to the body of
Christ.
Unfortunately, many
evangelicals are quick to discount — and even damn — their fellow
brothers and sisters in Christ over alleged doctrinal trespasses, even
if those same brothers and sisters hold to the historical orthodox
creeds (Apostle’s Creed, Nicene Creed, etc.). Such discounting and
damning can always be avoided and it serves no one on the Kingdom side
of the aisle.
When diversity within
orthodoxy is encountered, grace should be extended. Just as we would
want grace extended to us, seeing that none of us sees perfectly
(Matthew 7:12).
The words of Paul of
Tarsus contain thunder and lightning for us all, “Now our knowledge is
partial and incomplete . . .” (1 Corinthians 13:9, NLT).
Today, we’ll be looking at some of the surprising and controversial beliefs of D.L. Moody.

In many respects, D.L. Moody is one of my favorite movers-and-shakers in church history.
He
— along with A.W. Tozer, Charles Spurgeon, G. Campbell Morgan — was a
powerful witness to God’s sod-turning penchant for greatly using people
who didn’t have formal theological educations.
In Moody’s case, he was poorly educated across the board. Yet the hand of God was undeniably upon him.
Interestingly,
the first time Moody applied to be a member of a local church, he was
denied because he failed an oral exam on Christian doctrine!
Moody
ministered to the soldiers in the Civil War. President Lincoln visited
his Sunday School, and President Grant attended one of his revival
meetings.
He was famously nicknamed “Crazy Moody,” and it’s
reported that he reached 100 million people with the gospel, in a day
when televangelists, radio preachers, and Al Gore (the Internet,
ahem) didn’t exist.
If
you’ve ever heard the statement, “God hates sin, but loves the sinner,”
that’s been ascribed to Moody. Here are three other Moodyisms:
“Character is what a man is in the dark.”
“If there had been a committee appointed, Noah’s ark would never have been built.”
And my favorite one of all,
“Some
men grow smaller and smaller on an intimate acquaintance; but my
experience is that the more and more you know of Christ, the larger He
becomes.”
Armed with a 5th grade education, noted as a horrible
speller with a poor vocabulary, and void of any theological training,
Moody founded several schools. In addition, a Bible college and
publishing house which still exist were both named after him. Rather
surprising given how poorly educated he was.
Moody was essentially
a “lay-evangelist.” He wasn’t an ordained minister nor a theologian or
scholar. In fact, observers got the impression that he was little more
than a “country bumpkin.” Yet he was incredibly effective in reaching
people with the gospel of Christ.
Another thing that impresses me
about Moody was his heart for the poor. When he began his ministry in
the Chicago slums (called “Little Hell” because of its danger), Moody
was barely into his 20s. He had a heart for “the lest, the last, and the
lost,” spending all of his savings to help the indigent, even risking
harm to himself.
NOW HOLSTER YOUR
WEAPONS AND READ THIS BEFORE PROCEEDING: The following beliefs aren’t
shocking to me necessarily. They were, however, surprising and
disturbing to many evangelical Christian’s during Moody’s day. And they
will trouble some evangelicals today.
The Blog
Manager tells me that if you post a comment that says (with chest thrown
outward), “I don’t find any of these to be shocking!,” your comment
will be deleted. We’ve already covered this in the above statement; so
there’s no need for you to tell the world what we already know.

All
told, here are some beliefs that Moody held that were shocking in his
time, some of which will unsettle some evangelicals today.
1. Moody seldom preached on hell.
This was shocking in a day when 18th-19th century Revivalists and
evangelists made “hell” a major point in their preaching. When Moody
caught criticism for this, his response was, “A great many people say I
don’t preach on the terrors of religion. I don’t want to — don’t want to
scare men into the kingdom of God.” Because the love of God broke his
own heart, Moody opted to preach God’s love and avoid the subject of
hell in most of his sermons.
2. Moody believed that Jesus would take the church away from the earth before He comes in judgment. Moody
was the first famous premillenialist in North American history. It is
not clear, however, if he ascribed to the tight dispensationalism of a
secret rapture followed by a seven-year Tribulation, an idea spawned by
John Nelson Darby in the mid 1800s.
However, Moody did believe
that the Christ would take the bride out of the world to the place He
had prepared for her before He came in judgment. This of course sounds
like Darby’s secret rapture theory, but Moody was not precise about the
details, so we cannot be sure of his exact views on the subject.
Nevertheless,
many who regard Moody to be a “hero” in the faith today reject the idea
that Jesus will remove His bride from the earth before He comes in
judgment as well rejecting premillenialism.
3. Moody embraced the Christian evolutionist Henry Drummond as being “the most Christ-like man I ever knew.”
Such an “endorsement” was shocking in Moody’s day. And it will
certainly raise the ire of those Christians who damn other believers
with the “guilt-by-association” card today.
Moody was viciously
attacked as a “heretic” simply because he allowed Drummond to speak at
some of his Christian conferences. And there’s good reason to believe
that he lost sizeable financial support as a result.
Drummond was
written off by many Christians because he believed that God created
humans through the mechanism of evolution. Moody rejected evolutionary
theory, but that didn’t dissuade him from befriending and endorsing
Henry Drummond. Nor did it dissuade others from condemning Moody with
the same vitriol that they leveled against Drummond. (Regrettably, this
sort of thing still happens today in the Christian world.)
4. Moody didn’t exclude women from ministry and even permitted them to preach from the pulpit. Again,
a shocker for his time. And in the minds of contemporary
“Complementarians” who believe women should be muzzled (I mean excluded)
from ministering to men, what Moody believed about this is considered
“unbiblical.”
5. Moody didn’t believe in making doctrine an issue. For this reason, both Calvinists and Arminians claimed him on the one hand, but they were infuriated him on other other.
The
Arminians had running fits over his “once in grace, always in grace”
view and Calvinists had apoplexy over his emphasis on human
responsibility, faith-is-a-choice view, and his belief in the universal
provision of salvation.
According to Moody, “I don’t try to
reconcile God’s sovereignty and man’s free agency.” That statement
didn’t endear him to either Calvinists or Arminians.
6. Moody believed in interdenominational ecumenicism. This also disturbed hardcore Calvinists and Arminians.
Moody
embraced the “liberal” causes of social reform, church unity, and
ecumenism, but he also embraced the “conservative” causes of
premillenialism in evangelistic efforts (believing that the world was a
sinking ship, and Christians were obligated to rescue as many as
possible before the ship sank).
Moody was seen as a bridge between
conservatives and liberals, combining issues that polarized both sides.
(Parenthetically, this is why one of the reasons why I love Moody so
much. See my
20 Reasons Why the Christian Left and the Christian Right Won’t Adopt Me).
This quote by Moody captures his heart on the matter:
“Talk
not of this sect and that sect, of this party and that party, but
solely and exclusively of the great comprehensive cause of Christ …
There should be one faith, one mind, one spirit – and in this city let
us … actualize this glorious truth … Let us contend for Christ only …
May the Spirit of God may give us one mind and one spirit to glorify His
holy name.”
Moody quickly learned, however, that transcending the
hardcore left and the hardcore right is a dangerous place in which to
live because both sides take dead aim at you!
7. Moody found some of the Catholic mystics to be helpful. This one would have gotten him roasted over a slow spit by some Christian groups today. In his
One Thousand and One Thoughts from My Library, Moody cites 225 authors. And they include the Christian mystics Madame Guyon and Madame Swetchine.
8.
Moody believed all Ten Commandments were binding on Christians with
penalties for violators, and he criticized preachers for not emphasizing
them enough. What makes this surprising is that he criticized his mentor Charles Spurgeon on these very grounds saying,
“I
do not remember ever to have heard a sermon preached on the
commandments. I have an index of two thousand five hundred sermons
preached by Spurgeon, and not one of them selects its text from the
first seventeen verses of Exodus 20. The people must be made to
understand that the Ten Commandments are still binding, and that there
is a penalty attached to their violation. We do not want a gospel of
mere sentiment. The Sermon on the Mount did not blot out the Ten
Commandments.”
Many Christians today are divided over the role of
the Law of Moses in the life of the Christian. And still more believe
that the Sabbath command was fulfilled in Christ, feeling that
Christians aren’t obligated to keep Saturday (which is the Sabbath)
holy.
On the other hand, Moody believed that a countless number of
“careless Christians” will get to heaven by “the skin of their teeth.”
On this score, he wrote,
“Moreover, it
seems highly probable; indeed I think it is clearly taught by
Scripture, that a great many careless Christians will get into heaven.
There will be a great many who will get in by the skin of their teeth,
or as Lot was saved from Sodom, so as by fire. They will barely get in,
but there will be no crown of rejoicing. But everybody is not going to
rush into heaven. There are a great many who won’t be there.”
WARNING: The
Blog Manager who moderates comments appreciates D.L. Moody. Therefore,
if anyone wields accusations like “D.L. Moody is the mouthpiece of
Satan” and other such sentiments, our beloved Blog Manager says he won’t
approve the comment.
So to the both of you who found this post on
the Web somewhere and are starting to march toward the comments box
with pitch forks, blow torches, and blunt objects in order to
delegitimize, castigate, or marginalize Lewis beyond repair, your remark
will vanish into the electricity after he hits the DELETE key.
In
addition, the Blog Manager says that those of you who repeat what’s
already stated in the blue note at the top — that some will not find
this list to be shocking or surprising (especially non-evangelicals),
he will not approve the comment. He wants to keep the comments thread uncluttered to focus on this singular question.
Can
you add any other surprising or controversial beliefs that Moody held?
If so, please provide a source also. Note that we’re not interested in
behaviors, but beliefs.
Other Posts in the Series with More to Come
Shocking Beliefs of John Calvin
Shocking Beliefs of Jonathan Edwards
Shocking Beliefs of John Wesley
Shocking Beliefs of C.S. Lewis
Subscribe to the blog (scroll down) so you don’t miss the next installment of the series.
SOURCES
D.L. Moody – A Life by Kevin Belmonte
Dwight L. Moody: American Evangelist by James Findlay
The Life of Dwight L. Moody by William Moody
The Wit and Wisdom of D.L. Moody by Stanley and Patricia Gundry
D.L. Moody: A Worker in Souls by Gamaliel Bradford
The Incredible Cover Up by Dave MacPherson
Christian History, Issue 25, Vol. IX, No. 1
Other Popular Posts
Read this Before You Drop the H-Bomb (“Heresy”)
3 Shocking Statements by Billy Graham
Haters Gonna Hate: How to Deal with Haters
Bono on Jesus
John Lennon on Jesus